"We seldom get into trouble when we speak softly. It is only when we raise our voices that the sparks fly and tiny molehills become great mountains of contention."
My
only daughter is expecting her first baby and I am thinking of
hosting a baby shower for her.
When
she was married, I hosted the bridal shower and her father and I paid
for and hosted the entire wedding. My future son-in-law’s
parents sent a large guest list of more than one hundred people
for both the bridal shower and wedding, but did not offer to pay for
any part of the shower or wedding. Nor did they help with the
invitations, arrangements, set-up or in any other way.
I
want to host a baby shower for my daughter, but I do not want to
include her in-laws because I do not feel that I am obligated to pay
for and host my son-in-law’s family again.
Answer:
I
am curious. What kind of bridal and baby showers do you host? Why
will it be a financial burden to invite your son-in-law’s
mother, sisters or aunts? Are you renting a ballroom at the St.
Regis? Have you chartered a yacht? And a guest list of over one
hundred people? For a bridal shower? And you are expecting a
similar number at a baby shower?
I
must say, that seems excessive. Especially when the host is the
mother of the honoree. Close relatives of the honoree are not the
correct hosts for showers; showers should be given by friends to
avoid the appearance of a family soliciting gifts for itself.
If
your friends, for example, have a fit of generosity and throw an
enormous, elaborate bridal shower for your daughter, to which they
invite everyone they know, well, that would be very kind of them, and
out of your control. But if you invite over one hundred people
to a shower for your own daughter, the expectation being that each
person will bring her a gift, well, that has another tone entirely.
So
my first suggestion for you is that you do not host a baby shower for
your daughter. Let her friends — or yours, if they offer —
host the shower, even if it will not be as fabulous a party as you
like to throw.
However,
if you do decide to host a baby shower for your daughter, let me make
four suggestions.
First,
do not invite one hundred people. Showers are for an honoree’s
close friends. And, I’ll concede, for your close friends, too.
But you should only invite people who are close to and feel genuine
personal affection for your daughter and you, people with whom you
socialize regularly. There is just no way that list should include
more than one hundred people.
Second,
include your son-in-law’s mother and other female relatives.
No matter how upset you are about the wedding (and we will get to
that in a minute), it would be unkind to exclude the other half of
your future grandchild’s family from an event you are hosting
to celebrate the baby.
Third,
if you think it will be too expensive to include your son-in-law’s
family, you should dial back your plans for the shower. When you
plan a party, you should first tally the number of guests, then
consider how to entertain them on your budget.
It
is entirely backwards to first plan the party and then see how many
people you can invite: the point of a social event is the people, not
the party.
Fourth,
do not ask your son-in-law’s mother for her guest list. You
must invite her, but you do not need to invite her friends unless
your daughter feels close to these friends and can come up with their
names on her own.
If
this lady wants to throw a shower for your daughter that includes the
lady’s friends, she is welcome to do so. There is no rule
against multiple showers hosted by and for different groups of
people. Although, again, it would be more appropriate if her friends
hosted the shower.
Now
let’s talk about the wedding, which is your real problem. You
resent the fact that your son-in-law’s family did not offer to
pay for or help with any of the wedding arrangements. Also, that they
submitted a guest list of over one hundred people. I am sorry —
or am I happy — to tell you that your resentment is misplaced.
Weddings
are traditionally hosted and paid for by the bride’s family
alone. Her family decides the number of guests, the venue, the
invitations, the music — it’s their show because they are
footing the bill. Of course, they are obligated to consider the
groom’s family’s situation.
For
example, they would not plan a destination wedding if his family
could not afford the travel (travel expenses rest with the traveler;
pay no attention to Father of the Bride) or plan an intimate
wedding for 50 guests if he has a large extended family. They are
also obligated to evenly divide the guest list, allotting half of the
spots to the groom’s family and friends.
The
groom’s family is obligated to provide a list of names and
addresses for their half of the guest list, to arrive on time, to
compliment everything and to be good sports. Or, as my mother puts
it, to keep your mouth shut and wear beige. They should not send a
guest list that exceeds the allotted number, and if they do, they
should expect to be asked to whittle it down.
The
groom’s family can, of course, throw their own party
celebrating the newlyweds at a later date. And the groom’s
family often offers to host a dinner or luncheon, or to pay for the
flowers or some other bill. But their participation in planning or
paying for the wedding is not required by any long-standing rule or
practice.
Now,
perhaps you don’t agree with this way of doing things. Perhaps
you don’t think it is fair. But your personal feelings about
wedding customs are not a fair basis for resenting your son-in-law’s
family. You can’t extract money or physical labor from his
family by declaring the traditions of wedding planning to be
offensive or inadequate. Nor can you harbor ill feelings about them
for complying with those long-standing rules.
Also,
I think you would have disliked it intensely if his family had tried
to help you with the arrangements: that help would have come with
opinions, and their money would have come with an obligation to
negotiate your plans with them.
Would
you really have welcomed their participation in the wedding planning?
Did you really want to hear their opinions and let them choose the
invitations, flowers, menu or photographer?
So
I suggest that you admit (to yourself — public flagellation is
not necessary unless you complained about this family publicly) that
you were wrong about the wedding expenses.
Next,
forgive your son-in-law’s family completely.
Then,
if you must throw a baby shower for your daughter, invite his mother.
With the arrival of grandchildren, goodwill between you and the other
grandma is essential. If you don’t believe me, just wait until
the first time that you need to trespass on “her” holiday
for your important family event.
Do
you have a quandary, conundrum, or sticky situation in your life?
Click this button to drop Cyndie a line, and she’ll be happy to
answer your question in a future column. Any topic is welcome!
Cynthia Munk Swindlehurst spent her childhood in New Hampshire and her
adolescence in San Diego. She served a mission in Manaus Brazil. She
graduated from Brigham Young University with a degree in English and from
Duke University with a law degree.
She practiced law until her first child was born. She enjoys reading, tap
dancing, and discussing current events. She and her husband live in
Greensboro, North Carolina with their two sons.
Cyndie serves as the Sunbeams teacher in her ward.