Recently,
our Sunday School teacher read an old quote from a long-dead general
authority about a sensitive topic. The quote was at odds with the way
this topic is taught and discussed today, to the point that I would
call it false doctrine. It certainly wasn’t true doctrine. I
also know it was personally hurtful to at least one member of the
class.
I
wanted to say something to correct the teacher, but several things
stopped me. The bishopric member in the class — who I expected
to speak up and correct the teacher — didn’t seem in the
least perturbed by the quote. No one else in the class seemed to
notice that the quote was way off base. And I didn’t want to
stand out as a contrary grump.
That
was weeks ago, and I feel upset and ashamed that I didn’t say
anything. I wish I had. But I’m not sure how I should have
approached the situation.
What
could I have done to correct the teacher?
Answer:
Your
instinct to speak up in favor of true doctrine was right. According
to section 12.1 of Handbook 2: Administering the Church, the
purpose of Sunday School is to:
“Strengthen
individuals’ and families’ faith in Heavenly Father and
Jesus Christ through teaching, learning, and fellowshipping.
“Help
Church members ‘teach one another the doctrine of the kingdom’
(D&C 88:77) at church and at home.”
Indeed,
every member of the class shares in this responsibility. A Sunday
School class cannot be successful if its members do not participate
in an appropriate way as guided by the teacher.
Nor
is it contemplated that the teacher will lecture with nary a comment,
week in and week out (although some lessons don’t lend
themselves to participation; lecture is fine now and then).
The
teacher’s responsibility is to teach the doctrine and to
“encourage class members to be responsible for their own gospel
learning as individuals, in their families, and during class
instruction.... Teachers and leaders provide opportunities for class
members to actively participate in discussions, and they invite class
members to live the gospel and receive the promised blessings.”
Handbook 2, section 5.5.4.
Listening
attentively to the lesson and pausing when your unfamiliar-doctrine
alert goes off is part of this personal responsibility.
In
your case, the Sunday School teacher said something that sounded
fishy to you. You felt compelled to speak up and disagree, but you
decided to keep silent. I think the regret you now feel is a good
indication that you ought to have spoken (assuming you don’t
have some ulterior, ignoble motive for contradicting the teacher).
Here
are four points for you to consider for the next time this happens.
Which is a guarantee. This will happen again.
One,
are you sure you are right? It is a good practice to look up
unfamiliar doctrinal points and quotes before declaring them true or
false. The Internet makes this easy to do during Sunday School. You
can enter a phrase in your favorite search engine and it will almost
always provide you with the complete citation and source. From there,
you can evaluate the value of the passage.
Sometimes,
the passage itself will clear up any misunderstanding when read in
its entirety. If this is the case, you can raise your hand and say
something like, “That quote from Elder Long Dead is
interesting, because although he says such-and-such, he goes on to
say this-and-that, which is how Elder Not Dead described this topic
in the last General Conference.”
Your
search might also turn up a relevant scripture or a recent use of the
quote that would be illuminating for the class.
If
your search proves unfruitful or inconclusive, and if you cannot
produce a reliable source for your point of view, perhaps you are
wrong about the doctrine. You should break out your scriptures and
study until you understand it.
You
could also raise your hand and ask a question. “I’ve
always heard that such-and-such is true, but that doesn’t seem
to line up with the quote we just read. I’m trying to think of
what scripture would apply, but I’m drawing a blank.” Of
course, you should only do this if you think someone in the class can
actually answer your question.
Two,
don’t throw the teacher under the bus. Doctrine is
important. People are important, too. If you humiliate the teacher,
neither he nor the other class members will care about your doctrinal
point. Instead, they will think you are a jerk.
So,
if you decide to say something, make your tone respectful and
helpful, not exasperated, snide or arrogant. Also, make sure what you
have to say is actually important to the lesson. If the false
doctrine was mentioned in an aside or as a brief point from which the
class has moved on, it might not be worth it to stop the class and go
back.
You
should also remember that people are not always as confident or
unflappable as they seem. People who are extraordinarily blunt when
criticizing others are often unable to take the treatment they
routinely dish out.
Three,
if you decide to try to correct false doctrine, do so by introducing
true doctrine in a positive way. You don’t have to
contradict the teacher outright with an eye roll or a blunt, “That’s
not true.” Instead, you can say:
Alma
5 teaches about this principle. Verse 9 says ....
The
Church has an official statement about this topic. It’s called
Important Statement and you can find it on the Church website. The
third paragraph reads ….
You
know, there is very little actual revelation on this topic. Elder
Not Dead said in Conference two years ago that we rely on faith in
this area, because we simply don’t know....
I’ve
always thought of this as ....
In
my experience ....
Elder
Bednar recently wrote an article for the Ensign about that
quote. He said ....
You
just said X, but I think you meant Y. (Use this one if the teacher
simply misspoke, and it’s important that the class members
hear the correct version.)
All
through your comment, your face should be pleasant and your tone
should be positive. You should share your own experiences and not
insult other people (even people who are not present). Do not be
sarcastic.
Four,
I can understand why you hesitated to correct the false doctrine in
Sunday School when a member of the bishopric was sitting right there.
It is likely part his assignment to make sure the class stays on
track, and it was not unreasonable of you to watch to see if he
wanted to correct what was said.
However,
having a member of the bishopric attend Sunday School does not
absolve the other class members from their responsibility to speak up
when false doctrine is presented as truth. It would have been
perfectly appropriate for you to speak up.
It
would also have put the teacher on notice that he had better be sure
about the sources he uses in his future lessons.
Do
you have a quandary, conundrum, or sticky situation in your life?
Click this button to drop Cyndie a line, and she’ll be happy to
answer your question in a future column. Any topic is welcome!
Cynthia Munk Swindlehurst spent her childhood in New Hampshire and her
adolescence in San Diego. She served a mission in Manaus Brazil. She
graduated from Brigham Young University with a degree in English and from
Duke University with a law degree.
She practiced law until her first child was born. She enjoys reading, tap
dancing, and discussing current events. She and her husband live in
Greensboro, North Carolina with their two sons.
Cyndie serves as the Sunbeams teacher in her ward.