Back
in the not-so-long-ago middle-ages, parents would farm their kids out
to craftsmen. The children would work long hours for these
craftsmen. And the amazing part (at least for us) is that the
children got paid nothing. Zero. Nada.
Now
to us this seems very unfair and really somewhat abusive to the kids
(child labor laws, anyone?). But a few hundred years ago, having
enough food to feed your family for most people was very difficult
and this situation was a win-win-win.
The
family unloaded one of their kids and no longer had to provide for
their needs.
The
craftsman got someone that could help with the work, and as the kid
gained more experience could increase the amount of work (revenue)
the craftsman could generate. Even though the craftsman would lose
money when the child first came to him, he thought of the child as an
investment that would pay off in the future.
So
what did the kid get? He got a skill. And when he was older he would
be able to use that skill to produce something that people would be
willing to buy. It meant that he would have the money to get married
and have his own family.
So
what are we to make of this current proposal to increase the minimum
wage to more than $10 per hour?
First,
the increase in minimum wage will increase the amount of unemployment
in the country. The Congressional Budget Office said that the
increase in minimum wage will likely cost 500,000 jobs.
Second,
the elevated wage will help some people live better lives.
In
our current economy there really are not that many jobs (1-2%) that
pay the current minimum wage. At the company I work for, I doubt
there is anybody at the corporate headquarters that makes $7.25/hour.
A business does not like to spend time recruiting and training new
people. It takes time and resources and really is not enjoyable.
The
minimum wage is any entry level wage into the workforce of a company.
It is comparable to the zero amount of money the children
apprentices used to make. Even at the minimum wage, it may take a
while before the person really starts contributing and making money
for the employer.
We
have all had experience working with people that are new to the
workforce. On average, their work ethic is not the best, they like
to talk a lot during work, and they do not know how to stick with the
task.
In
my line of work, errors are not permitted. So an experienced person
has learned how to put checks in their work to make sure they have
not made a mistake. When there is a new employee it requires
consistent review of their work and constant reinforcing of the
importance of no mistakes.
Once
someone has entered the workforce and shown that they are a reliable,
hardworking employee, then a smart employer quickly increases their
pay to try and keep them happy. Constant turnover is expensive for a
company.
Since
it seems everyone has an opinion about what will happen if the
minimum wage rate is increased, here is my assessment looking into my
(very cloudy) crystal ball.
The
impact on unemployment would be more dramatic than even what the
Congressional Budget Office is predicting. The raising of the wage
would ripple throughout the economy. Those employees that were
making $10/hr will now be asking for more since they would not feel
(correctly) they should be not be compensated the same as someone who
has no skills at the job.
This
rippling through the economy would absolutely be devastating for any
company that is marginally staying in business. The impact on small
businesses would exceed the impact on a large employer. For example,
McDonalds will survive, but all the small landscaping business you
see working on people’s yards would be severely affected by the
increase.
The
increase in labor costs in the long run will force employers to look
for more ways to automate so they can reduce their level of
employment. Or another likely possibility is that some companies
will look to send more jobs overseas since the government has just
increased the wage differential between the U.S. and developing
countries.
The
unemployment rate for youth (already at a horrendous 16%) will grow
much higher. Frankly, there are not that many teenagers that are
worth $10/hr. Why would anyone hire a teenager when there will be
plenty of older adults looking for a job that have worked before and
you do not have to put up with so much immaturity?
All
of these things are easy to see and easily predictable. But what 95%
of the media will focus on are the lucky few that get the wage
increase. How many articles or reports do you see or hear about
talking about the chronic long-term unemployment problem and the 20
million still looking for work? These people out of work will not be
found by the media until there is a Republican in the White House.
For
total disclosure, I am for a minimum wage and think there are times
when it can be increased without such deleterious effects. When the
economy is booming and wage rates are increasing anyway because of
the demand for labor, then make the increase in the minimum wage rate
(though not this large).
Also,
while the Middle Ages example of kids working for free is not one to
follow, a reasonable teenage wage policy by the federal government
would be a welcome relief.
Adam Smith is obviously not the actual name of the author of this column. The real author has
worked for two Fortune 500 companies, one privately held company, and a public accounting
firm. His undergraduate degree was in accounting, and he earned an MBA for his graduate
degree. He also has completed coursework for a PhD. in finance. He continues to be employed
by one of the Fortune 500 companies.
The author grew up in the Washington D.C. area but also lived for several years in Arizona. He
currently resides with his family on the East Coast.
The author has held various callings in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.