Every country has a
distinct economic system. What does that mean?
There are two
extreme types of modern economic systems – unrestrained
capitalism and total dictatorship. Back when I was growing up,
America and the Soviet Union/China were held up as the best examples
of these two extremes. I was taught that America was moving towards
more government control of the economy and the Soviet Union was
moving towards a more capitalistic society and that eventually the
two would meet in some sort of harmonic, euphoric, economic bliss.
I actually believed
this rubbish. Of course I was a product of public education.
I am going to talk
about three basic systems that are prevalent today. The first is the
totalitarian economy. This is defined as an economy that is in all
material aspects controlled by the government. Even companies that
are private, owned by individual people, are controlled by the
government. The government controls the prices of goods and
allocates the available capital to different industries and projects.
This economic system
is always headed for economic collapse and disaster. Always. That
does not suggest that the country and government may not continue for
many years. The economic system in these countries exists to enrich
the ruling class. As long as the military leaders get their share of
the economic pie then the government can go on and on. There is
almost no middle class in these countries and the poverty in these
countries is heartbreaking.
There is little
possibility for people to work hard and get ahead. You are born
poor, live poor and die poor.
Examples of
countries that fall into this system are Cuba, many African
countries, and Myanmar.
The next system is
the one where there is some economic freedom but there are still
large sections of the economy controlled by the government. These
economic systems allow for some personal property rights and people
can improve their station in life. Many of the former communist
countries that would have been in the previous group now fall into
this group.
By releasing a small
amount of control and allowing individuals or companies to earn a
profit, China has soared. Russia has settled into this system with
very spotty success due to the level of corruption in the government.
In this system, the government still wields almost total power and
allocates capital to great inefficiencies. But at least there is
some hope.
I would suggest that
there are many European countries that are getting very close to
falling into this economic system. Restraints on business in
countries like France and Spain are increasingly causing economic
stagnation.
There is a key point
to be made here. Generally, whenever a government imposes mandates on
businesses there are inefficiencies created. This is true even when
the mandates are for the good of the workers.
Consider France, the
government is very active in the business community mandating maximum
hours worked, ability to fire employees, etc. Even though
intervention into the economic system by the government is done for
the workers and at their request, it is still a drag on the economy
as a whole. These mandates help those with a job, but create an
economic system that just does not create very many new jobs.
France’s long-term unemployment rate is horrific.
These economic
systems also are not long-term sustainable. China will have to
choose between economic vitality and control over the population.
Russia is an energy glut (a real possibility with the right US
administration) away from economic chaos. France and Spain are
getting close to the end of the government give away scheme.
That leaves the last
group or the free economies of the world. This group allows the
markets to allocate resources using pricing mechanisms such as cost
per unit or interest rates. This group has the long-term ability to
be stable because they are constantly reinventing their economies.
Because of the economic freedom allowed, the workers in the country
know they can move up the socio-economic ladder with hard work and
some creative new ideas.
These countries
create the new industries that drive growth in the world economy.
The US is the best
example. Other countries may copy our technology but who invented
the technology industry. Silicon Valley rules technological
innovation. Everyone thought energy was a mature predictable
industry until some innovative engineers in America created new ways
to get oil and natural gas and now America is looking like an energy
goliath for the foreseeable future. (Again, with an administration
that does not hate fossil fuels.) This happens again and again in an
economically free society.
Countries in this
system are the US, Canada, Germany, Poland and the Czech Republic.
Of course there are
so many gradations between these three groups. Each country has its
own system based on its history. It is not an overstatement to say
that the world needs a strong US economy. The more the US moves to
greater government intervention into the economic system the more
likely it is to become stagnant like some of the European countries
or even Japan. The world cannot afford for the US to become like
France.
Adam Smith is obviously not the actual name of the author of this column. The real author has
worked for two Fortune 500 companies, one privately held company, and a public accounting
firm. His undergraduate degree was in accounting, and he earned an MBA for his graduate
degree. He also has completed coursework for a PhD. in finance. He continues to be employed
by one of the Fortune 500 companies.
The author grew up in the Washington D.C. area but also lived for several years in Arizona. He
currently resides with his family on the East Coast.
The author has held various callings in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.