"We seldom get into trouble when we speak softly. It is only when we raise our voices that the sparks fly and tiny molehills become great mountains of contention."
I was all set to
write an article about CEOs when the Dow Jones had to go and hit an
all-time high, so I felt compelled to write about the stock market.
During the economic
crisis of 2008, the Federal Reserve (Fed) brought interest rates down
to try and stabilize the economy. The economy was shrinking, so
pushing more money into the banking system made sense. The federal
government then spent a trillion dollars to try and stimulate the
economy. These were the two strategies that theoretically were going
to bring the economy back to prosperity.
They did not work.
Bank’s
reserves grew dramatically (up 350%) but lending was subdued.
Business waited to see what was going to happen after the slight
uptick in economic growth from the stimulus and really did nothing,
because the rate of growth became anemic. But the Fed had one new
thing they were going to try. They were going to buy long term
securities to push down long term interest rates. This is why you
are getting daily calls about refinancing your mortgage. Long term
rates are at historically low levels which allow lenders to refinance
your mortgage at much lower rates than when you purchased your home.
This sounds like a
good idea but there is a very ugly side to the low interest rates.
Retired individuals that depend on some income from their investments
to survive are getting almost none. Bank rates are almost at 0% and
interest rates on longer term investments CDs, etc. are not much
better. Another policy implemented that hurts the most vulnerable
among us.
What does this have
to do with the DOW hitting an all-time high?
A return on
investments is based on the amount of risk associated with the
investment. For example, the interest rate income received from
purchasing a Treasury Bill (t-bill) of the U.S. government is very
low since the t-bill is considered risk free. The interest rates
then increase from there. The rate on bonds issued by very stable
profitable companies is a few percentage points higher than the
t-bill rate. The rate on debt issued by companies not stable or
profitable can have much higher rates than the stable companies.
Stocks are
considered more risky than debt from stable companies, so there is an
additional premium placed on stocks. The riskier the stock (or
company) then the greater the premium placed on the returns for the
shares. For example (trying to keep it simple), there are two
companies that both state they are going to pay $1/share in a year
for a dividend. The stable company’s stock may trade at
$10/share giving you a 10% return. It is very likely you are going
to get the $1 for your $10 investment. The riskier company would
trade at $5/share. If you actually got the $1 you would have a 20%
return, of course the likelihood of getting nothing is much higher
with the risky company than with the stable company.
So looking at the
return rates for the different investments (this is a simple example
to explain a concept): t-bill is 3%, stable corporate bond is 3%
over t-bill so 6%, and stable company stock 4% over bonds so 10%.
This relation
between the investments will generally hold. So when the Fed lowers
interest rates there is a mechanical correction that happens in the
bond and stock markets. The stock and bond prices increase which
drives down the returns from their interest. (For those interested,
if the rate of return is x/price of bond or stock, then keeping x
constant and raising the price decreases the return.) This keeps the
premium in balance between t-bills, bonds, and stocks.
When the Fed
decreased short term interest rates a few years ago this correction
was quickly impounded in the price of stocks. What is happening now
is really different.
By driving down
expected long term interest rates, the Fed is causing long term
expected returns from stocks to go down which is driving up the price
of stocks. This is all part of the Feds plan to “create
wealth” in the economy, to make people feel richer and hence
spend more money and expand the economy.
That is why the
stock markets are so high. It is not due to some great underlying
fundamental driving real growth and hundreds of thousands or even
millions of people getting employment.
People on Wall
Street understand this issue. Warren Buffet recently stated that
money managers have their fingers on hair triggers ready to sell when
they see that the Fed is going to change policy and increase interest
rates. The professionals will be ready for the sell-off of stocks.
So who will be the ones hurt most.
Remember the seniors
that need to make more money on their investments to survive. Out of
necessity they are moving their money from savings to bonds and
stocks. They will never know where their money went.
Adam Smith is obviously not the actual name of the author of this column. The real author has
worked for two Fortune 500 companies, one privately held company, and a public accounting
firm. His undergraduate degree was in accounting, and he earned an MBA for his graduate
degree. He also has completed coursework for a PhD. in finance. He continues to be employed
by one of the Fortune 500 companies.
The author grew up in the Washington D.C. area but also lived for several years in Arizona. He
currently resides with his family on the East Coast.
The author has held various callings in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.