When
art-dealer-to-be Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler faced his Uncle Sigmund’s
Grand Inquisitor, who might deny him that dream, he thought, “I
wanted to be the dealer who offered for public admiration paintings
which the public knew absolutely nothing about and for which it would
be necessary to blaze a trail.”
As
inventors of what became known as Cubism, Braque and Picasso were
virtual equals, and both, drawing from the achievements of Cézanne
and Derain, sought new answers to certain esthetic problems.
Picasso
searched for his answers in the deep, hot dust of his Bateau-Lavoir
studio, where Kahnweiler had found him. Braque, though, had gone to
l’Estaque, near Marseille. There was no communication between
the two painters, and contrary to legend each was ignorant of what
the other was doing. But both were moved by a response to common
cultural forces.
Not
until the winter of 1908 did they begin to work together, searching
and counter-stimulating each other; but again contrary to legend,
they never painted side by side or signed each other's canvases.
Their collaboration was of ideas.
Le Bateau-Lavoir, (The Laundry Boat) side view; a warren of hovels for a very long list of impoverished, unrecognized artists. It was in his studio here that Picasso painted his breakthrough Cubist Les Desmoiselles d’Avignon.
Le Bateau-Lavoir, evidently an end view from the top of the hill, not far from Place de Tetre and the Montmartre Cathedral. It was destroyed by fire in 1970.
"When
we created Cubism," Picasso said later, "we had no
intention of creating Cubism but to express what was in us."
Since
the Renaissance artists had been striving in one way or another to
paint an illusion of objects on board or canvas. By means of
gradations of lights and shadows they simulated three dimensional
objects.
Color
and perspective contributed to the same deceptive role: there was no
actual object in the picture, only its skin, which, engaging in an
emotional game with the beholder's memory, induced the beholder to
feel he was looking at a real object.
Picasso
and Braque, going steps beyond Cézanne's path, sought to
depart further from these Italian precedents. They wanted to figure
three dimensional things on one flat surface — and to
incorporate these objects into that surface, not in the hoary
illusion of form produced by light and shadow but in showing all
three dimensions by means of a design traced on the plane surface.
To
do so meant that the various surfaces of an object would have to be
detached one from another and placed side by side.
Pleasant
compositions were
ripped to pieces, and in their places went more articulated
structures of sharp angles and varieties of colors — yellow,
red, blue, black — traced with thread lines.
Picasso
discovered that trying to manipulate both color and composition to
his new vision was too difficult, for color repeatedly became a
block. After many frustrating pictures, he dropped color to a
secondary role and concentrated on development of his dimensional
ideas.
Georges Braque, Maisons de l’Estaque (aka Houses and Trees), 1908. Early Cubist painting carries traces of Cézanne influence.
Pablo Picasso, Portrait of Haniel-Henry Kahnweiler. Cubism in full flower.
Kahnweiler
could see slowly emerging the "habitual consequence" of the
conflict between representation and construction: deformation.
Put
another way, Picasso and Braque were trying to transmit to the
spectator their visual experiences without the illusionist imitation.
The spectator would have to think
instead of feel. He would be shown
several sides of the object at the same time: in the one flat surface
of the painting he might see several surfaces of an object (or even
the inside), as he might discover if he walked around the object. But
in so doing the spectator would have to accept the object not as his
memory and emotion reminded him but as the artist wanted him to see,
as the object was reconceived in the artist’s imagination.
If
you can wrap your mind around that paragraph, you can understand the
first basics of Cubism.
Even
a hundred years later, to many the concept is arcane.
Matisse
might say, "I have painted the body of a woman,"
Picasso,
having rendered the same subject, would declare, "I have painted
a picture."
"The
Cubist painters," said art critic Raynal, "would go all the
way to rejoin the ancient idealism of the philosophers in denying the
value of the senses as instruments of knowledge."
It
was all a new language — and a person could never read it
unless he either had remarkable intuitive response or made a
determined effort to learn it. Few people wanted to at first. They
could not overcome old habits. The distempered Degas snorted, "It
seems to me these young people are trying to make something too
difficult of painting."
Again,
a hundred years later, the sentiment still is echoed by many.
Kahnweiler
wrote to Picasso that one of his most loyal followers did not like
his most recent things. Picasso wrote back, "It's just like
that. He doesn't like it! We'll succeed in disgusting everybody."
Says
Kahnweiler, "I had not the slightest doubt, neither as to the
esthetic value of these pictures, nor to their importance in the
evolution of painting, for though I did not know the commerce of
painting, I did know painting."
Kahnweiler
was forced to make an exception to his no-special-fuss rule later in
1908, when he gave Braque a one-man show in his cramped gallery.
Braque had submitted six canvases — the famous l'Estaque series
— to the Salon d'Automne,
and the jury had rejected them all.
Two
members of the jury, artists Albert Marquet and Charles Guerin,
exercised their preemptive admission rights to force acceptance of
two of the six, a still life and a landscape. But in brazen violation
of salon regulations, which every candidate had agreed automatically
to accept when he entered a picture, Braque withdrew the lot.
To
protect Braque’s reputation and to capitalize on the
scandal, Kahnweiler hung all six, along with 21 other paintings of
the series, in his gallery.
The
dates, 9-28 November, were an important turning point in art history.
The
opening was austere enough: except for a modest catalog, which
contained a preface by poet Guillaume Apollinaire, Kahnweiler had yet
to spend that first sou on publicity. But Louis Vauxcelles, art
critic for Gil Blas, who had invented the term fauves
two or three years earlier, attended.
On
14 November 1908, he wrote, "Braque paints in small cubes,"
a terminology suggested previously by Henri Matisse, who also had
been a member ofthe jury and had tried to explain to
Vauxcelles what Braque had done.
Six
months later Vauxcelles wrote of "Cubism" in conjunction
with the Salon des Independents, and thus the term was given
currency, a quite different story later put forth by
careless-with-the-truth Apollinaire notwithstanding.
Despite
the esthetic uproar that had been set loose and only modest material
blessing, life these seminal years was calm and delightful for all
the principals. (The generation of Europeans who knew Europe from the
turn of the century until after the Second World War were almost
unanimously insistent that living in Europe had been the very best
prior to World War I, and these feelings were not mere nostalgia for
lost youth.)
Not
many people came into Galerie Vignon, but enough did to keep it
viable.
In
the mornings Kahnweiler would visit his artists and watch them work.
After lunch he played chess with Derain and Vlaminck. Braque and
Picasso had their studios in Montmartre, and often at five in the
afternoon they dropped their brushes and walked down the hill to pass
the rest of the day in the gallery.
Gertrude
Stein said that when she saw Picasso surrounded by the tall,
wide-shouldered, well-dressed, somewhat-dandyish Derain, Vlaminck,
and Braque, he had the air of Napoleon surrounded by his marshals.
Much
as he distasted nightlife, Kahnweiler accompanied Picasso on forays
into Montmartre nightclubs — such as Le Rat Mort (The
Dead Rat): "It was a sordid place, however, which should
have pleased Picasso because it was reminding him of the brothels of
Barcelona, I suppose" — and in other ways sought to be a
friend as much as dealer to his artists.
Picasso,
Braque, and Daniel-Henry became habitues at Le Lapin Agile (The
Agile Rabbit), where "Frede, with his huge beard, played the
guitar and sang… Our life was a simple life without worry
because we were sure of victory, and we were sure of ourselves."
Fridays
they went to the Medrano Circus. But none of the painters went with
their dealer to the theater, for which they had scant taste.
With
Vlaminck Kahnweiler became joint owner of an outboard motorboat,
l'Enchanteur, and a sailboat, Saint Matorel,
which they moored on the Seine.
On
Sundays when the pair did not go boating they went out of Paris to
Rueil to pass the day with Vlaminck's family.
Prices
improved steadily, and each year dealer and artists became a little
better off. Kahnweiler's circle included poets, many of whom were not
yet published. Vollard had enhanced his reputation by having old
texts illustrated by his artists. Kahnweiler decided to publish the
young poets — Apollinaire, Max Jacob, Pierre Reverdy —
illustrated with original graphics by their friends.
The
editions were strictly limited — never more than 100 copies —
but they became strong vehicles for advancing the careers of these
poets, with considerable benefit, too, to their illustrators.
Kahnweiler
met Fernand Léger in 1910. Léger had destroyed almost
all his earlier works, which had been Impressionist and Fauve, and
had hung a big painting, Nus dans le Forêt (Nudes in the
Forest), in the Salon des Independents and created a
sensation. Vauxcelles dubbed it "tube-ism," and Picasso
told Kahnweiler, "See — there is a fellow who brings
something new, because they don't give him the same name as us."
After
a number of studio visits, Kahnweiler persuaded Léger to sign
a contract. When Léger dangled the written document before the
eyes of his aged Norman peasant mother to show that he could indeed
earn his living with palette and brush, she so disbelieved the
evidence that she took the contract to an uncle who was a notary for
verification.
Through
Picasso Kahnweiler met another Spaniard, Juan Gris, three years
younger than the dealer, who had come to Paris in 1906 to avoid
conscription into the Spanish army. Gris’s work as a satirical
magazine illustrator for l'Assiette au Beurre (The Butter
Plate), Le Charivari (Chivaree), and Le Temoin (The
Witness) left him in poverty worse than Picasso's ever had been.
Gris
lived in the apartment on the left of the entrance to the
Bateau-Lavoir, and Kahnweiler had often seen him through the front
windows when he called on Picasso. The apartment had once belonged to
Kees Van Dongen and was "the most dilapidated in the shambling
building."
Too
poor to buy a bouncing chair for their boy, Gris's first wife hung
the baby by his diapers to the cross-bar on the window so he could
get some fresh air.
Of
medium stature and a face animated by "great black eyes of a
gypsy", Gris was rude and antisocial, probably because he could
not afford to join other painters in their haunts. He was seen
nowhere and was known by almost no one — so much was his
anonymity that one day he was hustled by the police as a member of
the Bonnot gang and was released from jail only when Derain came in
to vouch for him.
Not
until 1911 did Gris begin to paint seriously, first watercolors and
then oils. His art education, in Madrid, had been thorough, and it
took a long time for him to break out of its academic casting. During
his five years in Paris he had assimilated all the Cubist talk, and
after he began to paint he did it so well that his works were soon
hung in the Galerie Vignon.
"Juan
Gris, who knew perfectly well the insufficiency of his gifts,"
says Raynal in De Picasso au Surrealisme (From Picasso to
Surrealism), "was blessed, by contrast, with a sort of
fanaticism of knowledge by which he seemed to seek compensations for
the ineptitude against which he raged. At the time of the Renaissance
he would have been one of those numerous artists who acquired all
knowledge. In a scientific manner he endeavored to deepen the least
question that aroused his attention."
Though
Gris and Picasso were friends, Pablo could never fully accept Juan as
a painter. He argued with Gertrude Stein, "Why do you defend
Gris's painting? You know very well you don't like it."
To
prove him wrong, Gertrude wrote a book about Gris. Its completion
cooled the friendship between her and Picasso,
By
1912, then, Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler was the picture dealer for the
four great painters of Cubism: Picasso, Braque, Leger, and Gris. By
then other painters were on the scene who were learning the lessons
of Braque and Picasso and painting in the new fashion: Robert
Delaunay, Marcel Duchamp, Lyonel Feininger, Albert Gleizes, Henri
Hayden, Henri Le Fauconnier, André Lhote, Roger de la
Fresnaye, Piet Mondrian, Jacques Villon, and a host of lesser lights.
Their Cubism had been well represented in rooms set apart at the
Salon d'Automne of 1911.
Their
esthetic parentage was not so much Cézanne as van Gogh and
Gauguin. They were, as a group, more decorative and less
philosophically idealist. They were, says Raynal, obsessed with the
old respect for nature.
Kahnweiler
earned the enmity of them and their dealers by dismissing them as
"pseudo-Cubists" or Minor Cubists." He called them a
new academism, quoted Picasso's declaration that "Michelangelo
was not responsible for the Renaissance smorgasbord," and
declared that his "four greats" were "probably the
only Cubists."
Besides
the civil war among the Cubists themselves, there was the war against
the establishment.
In
October of 1921, Villon, Duohamp, Picabia, Gleizes and others staged
the Salon de la Section d'Or (Salon of the Golden Mean),
in which they included Marie Laurencin, Léger, Marcoussis,
Metzinger, La Fresnaye, and others.
After
this and the Cubists' participation at the Salon d'Automne, a
plot was concocted to bar the cubists from any future exhibiting in
government buildings.
The
municipal lawyer, Lampne, who happened to be an amateur painter, led
the assault, which was carried to the Senate by Jules-Louis Breton
and to the Chamber of Deputies, where Marcel Sembat, backed by the
Under Secretary for Fine Arts, contended that artists must have
freedom of expression and successfully beat back the attack.
Many
of these new Cubists were exhibited in the upstairs gallery of Léonce
Rosenberg on rue de la Baume, and bitter rivalry marked the two
dealers for the leadership of Cubism.
Rosenberg
added painters Gino Severini, Auguste Herbin, and Valmier to those
mentioned, and sculptors Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens, Csarky, and
Lambert-Ruchi. Many of these artists pondered the theories expounded
by Gris, whose scientific formation at the School of Arts and
Industries in Madrid was worth reckoning with.
Gleizes
and Metzinger published a book, Du Cubisme, on theory in 1912;
and the painters and sculptors gradually evolved their individual
personalities.
Some
of Kahnweiler's partisans had friends in both camps. Max Jacob, for
example, was an admirer of the now undeservedly obscure Henri Hayden,
whom he called "The Renoir of Cubism."
But
the bloodiest battle between Kahnweiler and Léonce Rosenberg
lay still a few years in the future.
Lawrence Jeppson is an art consultant, organizer and curator of art exhibitions, writer, editor
and publisher, lecturer, art historian, and appraiser. He is America's leading authority on
modern, handwoven French tapestries. He is expert on the works of William Henry Clapp, Nat
Leeb, Tsing-fang Chen, and several French artists.
He is founding president of the non-profit Mathieu Matégot Foundation for Contemporary
Tapestry, whose purview encompasses all 20th-century tapestry, an interest that traces back to
1948. For many years he represented the Association des Peintres-Cartonniers de Tapisserie and
Arelis in America.
Through the Smithsonian Institution Traveling Exhibition Service, the American Federation of
Arts, the Museum of Modern Art, and his own Art Circuit Services he has been a contributor to
or organizer of more than 200 art exhibitions in the United States, Canada, Japan, and Taiwan.
He owns AcroEditions, which publishes and/or distributes multiple-original art. He was co-founder and artistic director of Collectors' Investment Fund.
He is the director of the Spring Arts Foundation; Utah Cultural Arts Foundation, and the Fine
Arts Legacy Foundation
Lawrence is an early-in-the-month home teacher, whose beat is by elevator. In addition, he has spent the past six years hosting and promoting reunions of the missionaries who served in the French Mission (France, Belgium, and Switzerland) during the decade after WWII.