As
a motion picture, The Monuments Men is a mixed bag. I’d
give it three stars out of five. A sour critic writing in the
December 12 issue of Entertainment Weekly dubbed it the fifth
worst movie of the year.
He
described it as “listening to seven guys hum the national
anthem for two hours.”
That
reminded me of the two gentlemen at the Smithsonian’s Air and
Space Museum — one the director, the other the exhibit curator
— who, putting together an exhibition on Hiroshima, elected to
rewrite history.
One
of the men had been born in Czechoslovakia, and the other was a
Canadian. Their revisionist, anti-American take was so odoriferous
that it raised the hackles of Congress and the American Legion, and
both men were soon gone.
The
trouble with the George Clooney-directed The Monuments Men is
that it tried to distill an understandable scenario out of a subject
that was simply too, too big to capture in a two-hour film. So, much
had to be left out that gave the story substance and genuine
heart-stopping drama.
In
other words, the Robert Edsel book is much better than the movie.
But
it’s a book of many stories, several of which I have longed to
recount in “Moments in Art.”
Eleven
days before the Allied landings in France, Supreme Commander Dwight
Eisenhower issued the following order:
Shortly
we will be fighting our way across the Continent of Europe in battles
designed to preserve our civilization. Inevitably, in the path of our
advance will be found historical monuments and cultural centers which
symbolize to the world all that we are fighting to preserve. It is
the responsibility of every commander to protect and preserve these
symbols whenever possible.
In
the course of the war, lesser generals and officers sometimes had
trouble following these orders and were in conflict with the
Monuments Men trying to enforce them.
The
Monuments Men is about six lower-rank officers and two enlisted
soldiers with art backgrounds who were assigned to various Allied
armies during the Liberation. They had little military standing, but
they were given the task of cajoling commanders into sparing cultural
targets.
They
identified and cataloged art, objects, and structures that survived
devastation. They looked for missing pieces. Except when they found
really big caches of art the Nazis had stolen, they had no crews to
help them, and in most cases didn’t even have their own
transportation — no trucks, no jeeps, only the rides they could
beg when they needed to get from one place to another.
“It
was the duty of these eight officers to inspect and preserve every
important monument the Allied Forces encountered between the English
Channel and Berlin.” (Edsel, p. 65)
For
the most part, they worked singly and could not often confer one with
another. Each had separate adventures. That’s what made the
Clooney film so impossible to depict as a harmonious, understandable
unit. The film could not include the contexts that made each story so
vital. And each of these men had a scad of individual stories and
adventures.
A
dozen movies could easily have come from the book’s material.
Overshadowing
all these adventures was the huge avaricious web of Nazi theft a
tangled subculture of crooked dealers, thieves, forgers, black
marketeers, brigands, and traitors; and the Underground, which was
locked in an unwinnable war trying to preserve cultural patrimonies.
In
a much-earlier column I recounted the near-destruction of the
Chartres Cathedral. The cathedral was largely completed by 1250,
putting its soaring stained glass windows among the most glorious in
the world. These impressive windows have survived for more than 750
years.
Just
before World War II the windows were removed for safekeeping. There
is no way to hide a whole cathedral. During the Liberation, Allied
intelligence reported the cathedral was being used as a German
observation post, and American bombers were planning to level it.
Colonel
Welborn Griffith questioned the plan and volunteered to go behind
enemy lines with a single enlisted soldier. They discovered the
Germans were not using the cathedral. Bombing plans were scrapped.
Although
Griffith was not one of the Monuments Men, his story is a good
example of what the men were dedicated to do. Sometimes they were
trying to save a village containing important artifacts from
destruction, sometimes they were trying to save only a church or a
suspected repository where rumor had it stolen art was being
concealed, and sometimes they could only write cultural death notices
as the war moved on.
To
understand the complex, dangerous exploits of the Monuments Men, we
must step back a few years to examine the beginnings of this snarled,
black web in which their dramas played out.
In
his insanity and ruthlessness, Adolph Hitler genuinely believed his
Third Reich would last a thousand years. As its instigator, his name
would be glorious. So the monuments to his glory had to be glorious.
Hitler
was a failed landscape painter. One of the reasons he failed, other
than insufficient talent, was that he could never bring his taste
into the 20th Century.
He
hated “modern” painters, and in time this hate would lead
to the seizure and burning of thousands of pieces of “decadent”
art, including more than 1000 pieces by the great Emile Nolde. (See
my Moments column “Nazis Nullify Nolde–Big Time,”
29 July 2013.)
Even
before the war erupted, this art was being seized, often confiscated
from important German museums. To demonstrate his hate, exhibitions
of “refused” art were held. Some of the condemned pieces
were sold abroad to succor Hitler’s plots, but the majority
went to the flames.
Only
good, old-time Germanic art was really good enough.
Hitler examining a haul of modern, condemned art
Hitler
planned five great Führer Cities to exalt his achievements and
serve as Nazi ideological centers: Berlin, capital of the Third
Reich; Munich, the capital of the Nazi movement; Hamburg, the gateway
to the world; Nuremberg, the city of Party Congresses; and Linz,
Austria, the city of Hitler’s youth.
Compared
to the four cities in Germany, Linz was a backwater. But it exerted a
compelling force in Hitler’s pathological psyche. There, in his
home town overlooking the Danube, Hitler intended to build the
greatest cultural center in the world.
Besides
the Führer Art Museum, which would espouse the Nazi doctrine of
art and be greater than any other museum in the world, the new
megalopolis would include an Adolph Hitler Hotel, a 500-feet-high
bell tower to house the remains of the Führer’s parents, a
parade ground that could accommodate 100,000 of his followers, and a
festival hall that could handle 30,000 of them.
The
museum was to be two-thirds of a mile long and would eventually be
the repository for 16 million works of art.
Hitler examining models of the proposed Führer megalopolis in Linz.
“The
majority of these were taken from private Jewish collections. It
would also include works plundered by German special commandos from
museums, churches, and castles throughout the German occupied
territories. The so-called ‘Reserve of the Führer’
was a legal instrument that allowed Hitler to grab whatever he
wanted.” (Der Spiegel On Line International)
The
cultural patrimony of Europe was simultaneously raped by two
competing forces: the black art army scrounging for Hitler and the
equally black art army scrounging for Herman Göring.
Art-insatiable
Göring pretended the two were not in competition.
Before
Germany surrendered, a third black army (it was really red) would
crash the scene, intend on seizing any art in German hands,
regardless of original ownership, and hauling it back to Russia,
spoils of war and reparations.
That
explains the last drama in the movie, a Monuments Men effort to
rescue the overwhelming quantity of stolen art hidden in Austrian
salt mines before the Red Army arrived to take it all.
Lawrence Jeppson is an art consultant, organizer and curator of art exhibitions, writer, editor
and publisher, lecturer, art historian, and appraiser. He is America's leading authority on
modern, handwoven French tapestries. He is expert on the works of William Henry Clapp, Nat
Leeb, Tsing-fang Chen, and several French artists.
He is founding president of the non-profit Mathieu Matégot Foundation for Contemporary
Tapestry, whose purview encompasses all 20th-century tapestry, an interest that traces back to
1948. For many years he represented the Association des Peintres-Cartonniers de Tapisserie and
Arelis in America.
Through the Smithsonian Institution Traveling Exhibition Service, the American Federation of
Arts, the Museum of Modern Art, and his own Art Circuit Services he has been a contributor to
or organizer of more than 200 art exhibitions in the United States, Canada, Japan, and Taiwan.
He owns AcroEditions, which publishes and/or distributes multiple-original art. He was co-founder and artistic director of Collectors' Investment Fund.
He is the director of the Spring Arts Foundation; Utah Cultural Arts Foundation, and the Fine
Arts Legacy Foundation
Lawrence is an early-in-the-month home teacher, whose beat is by elevator. In addition, he has spent the past six years hosting and promoting reunions of the missionaries who served in the French Mission (France, Belgium, and Switzerland) during the decade after WWII.