Evrard
Jabach spawned a dynasty of adventurers in art. His genes and genius
imprinted on at least seven generations, leaving footfalls on
collectors and collections for more than 300 years.
The
house of Jabach eventually lost that name and morphed into the
Dynasty of Duveen. There are many tales, trials, and tribulations
scattered everywhere along these centuries, leading eventually to
some of the greatest art in American museums.
It
was never easy.
After
living in Antwerp, Jabach’s father acquired a noble piece of
land in Cologne, where he became among the first to be seated in the
Senate of Cologne. Until the birth of Eberhardt, all his children had
been girls. The boy's advent brought family happiness bordering on
hysteria.
Eberhardt
lacked for nothing. His early planting in finance and affairs took
root with the ease of a jungle. His taste for art was nurtured from
birth. The four Dürers that graced the family chapel would have
been enough to start his juices.
In
big business and banking the French were in kindergarten compared to
the postgraduates in London, Antwerp, and Amsterdam. Prime Minister
Cardinal Richelieu needed money-savvy manipulators in Paris —
and their money. Eberhardt was in his thirties when Richelieu,
Cardinal Mazarin’s predecessor, induced him and other select
foreigners to plow new furrows in Gaul.
At
the age of 37 he obtained a letter of naturalization and francofied
his name to Evrard. He found everything to his liking in Paris except
its women, and the next year returned briefly to Cologne to marry the
daughter of another négocient
and senator. He had been married only a year when he began to gather
the pearls of the collection of beheaded Charles I of England, as I
recounted earlier this year in my column “Art on the Chopping
Block”.
No
bride's home ever received a comparable enrichment. When Charles
LeBrun painted the Jarbachs a decade or so later, they had become a
happy family of four opulently dressed children, with a dog, two
ridiculous busts, one painting, a floor stand globe and yards of
brocaded draperies.
Charles LeBrun, Jabach Family Portrait. Painting was in the Kaiser Friedrich Museum in Berlin, destroyed by incentiary bombing, WWII.
The
enormous mansion Jabach built in Paris to house family and art would
have done justice to the conspicuous consumption of our later Fricks,
Vanderbilts, or Elizabeth Stuart Gardners. It was designed by one of
the most famous architects of the hour and stayed in the family for a
century, though it later housed a bourgeois theater and, ironically,
an art auction house.
In
October, 1665, Cardinal Mazarin brought Cavalier Bernini, who
perfected St. Peters, to Paris to design a new Louvre. Jabach invited
the architect to a solemn dinner. Also invited were financiers and
painters Mignard and LeBrun, who, though sworn enemies, saw the
wisdom of hiding the hatchet for one night.
After
the group had inspected the paintings, Jabach began bringing out his
incomparable portfolio of drawings and cartoons. A contemporary
recounted:
There
were some extraordinarily beautiful Raphaels, such as that of Attila.
Bernini saw the Poussin cartoon of Amide Carrying Renaud,
whose painting is in France, a quantity of Jules Romain, Titian, Paul
Veronese, and other masters. Finally he rose brusquely and said that
his eyes were worn out from seeing so many lovely things.
Assembling
his collection had not been easy for the puffy-lipped Jabach. Among
art lovers he was recognized as the most impassioned and the most
knowledgeable, and the least hesitant. His seemingly inexhaustible
resources were equally necessary, for dukes and ministers, less
astute collectors, and even secondhand dealers competed in fits.
Hyacinthe Rigaud, Portrait of Evrard Jabach, 1688
Speculation
and cupidity were full blossomed. Names like Titian, da Vinci, Rubens
had become almost generic terms attached to the work of many. In this
milieu Jabach bought and sold, sometimes to make money on the
transaction, sometimes to sweeten an unrelated business deal,
sometimes to flatter a powerful hand.
For
£3000 he sold to the Duc de Créque a Virgin
painted for Marie de Medicis, and in another deal he took from Compte
de Brienne another Virgin, this one a Veronese, and a Holy
Familv by Titian. For unknown reasons he sold the latter without
profit.
This
same Brienne later said that a small Virgin by Annibal
Carrache and a Portrait of Gaston de Foix by Giorgione that
Jabach sold for £1500 each to the Duc de Liancourt were very
exceptional copies fabricated by Sabastian Bourdon, an intimate of
Jabach. "All the collectors except Passant and me," said
Brienne, “were duped!"
Why?
An outright fraud? A politically-motivated trick to make Liancourt a
laughingstock? A ploy to undercut Liancourt's reputation as a
connoisseur? History does not say, except to record that, “The
poor Duc de Liancourt was upset by it all."
As
customary among wealthy collectors of the tine, Jabach employed a
workshop full of painters and engravers to provide him copies of
masterpieces he could not acquire and to spread prints of what he did
own. No sooner had his acquisitions from the London chopping block
been unpacked than he set Louis Boulogne to work making duplicates
that were so good the best experts in court debated their
authenticity.
Jabach
suddenly conceived an idea that was far advanced for the time: he
would put painter LeBrun under contract, paying the artist 12
pistoles a day and leaving him free to paint whatever he
wanted. LeBrun refused.
Nicolas de Largilliere, Charles LeBrun.
Prime
Minister Mazarin passionately loved beautiful things, but he knew how
to temper his taste with money, which had a marked place in all his
secret machinations. He used intermediaries in his transactions to
mask his hand. He sought only things of established reputation, and
for this Jabach's services were advantageous. If he could get
something cheaper by buying a whole collection, he did; then the
lesser things were promptly sent flying to a secret selloff.
Mazarin
died on Mar. 9, 1661, shortly after a fire broke out in the Galerie
d'Apollon in the Louvre while he was preparing a banquet for the
king. Works by Bunel, Dubreul, and Porbus were destroyed along with
the comestibles. Mazarin did not take his voluptuous paintings
wherever, heaven or hell, it was he went — the collection went
to King Louis XIV. In this single coup the royal collection started
by François I, who had been patron to the aged da Vinci, was
tripled.
Louis
succeeded because he moved with royal speed. The Mazarin stash was
taken immediately! What a theft: 670 pictures by masters of various
schools, 241 portraits, 331 copies, 250 statues and busts of the
Renaissance, 21 cabinets with great quantity of rock crystal and
Venice glass, 211 tapestries mostly woven in gold and silver, 46
Persian rugs of huge dimension, 21 grand furniture suites, jewelry,
and a library of 50,000 volumes.
The
king, however, had not moved fast enough to prevent the cardinal’s
heir, the Duke of Mazarin, from mutilating some of the most
erotic pictures because he was offended by their nudity.
Colbert
succeeded as Prime Minister of France.
Colbert,
Mazarin’s protégé, had worked himself up from
superintendent of royal building to prime minister on one premise:
glorify France and Louis XIV, the Sun King.
Pierre Mignard, Portrait of Cardinal Mazarin.
In
his grandiose plans he frequently turned to Jabach, his close friend,
for counsel and financial assistance. Jabach became an "auxiliary
to the minister."
In
realms of art, Evrard's money went to revitalize the production of
hand-woven tapestries, and he was named the director of the
Manufacture d'Aubusson. In business he was one of nine men named as
directors of a reorganized East India Company in 1664.
This
was France's third attempt to cash in on the mercantilism that had
made Spain and then England and The Netherlands wealthy. The Dutch
enterprise boasted 150 ships of commerce, 50 warships, and 10,000
armed men; it brought back from the Spice Islands cargos worth £l0
to £12 million in annual profit, which sometimes reached 50% of
invested capital. The French looked and licked their lips.
A
group of French businessmen contracted to have a ship built in
Holland. The Dutch accepted the order but angered the French with
insuperable delays. When they finally took payment and let the boat
depart, it sank.
The
screaming French asked Colbert's help. Colbert turned to a more
illustrious group of businessmen, "who could understand and
intelligently support his politics," among them Jabach. The new
directors were received by Louis at Fontainebleau.
The
King, prompted by Colbert, issued a royal charter, and even pledged
20% of the proposed £15 million capital and sent official
papers to 119 cities asking for financial support for the enterprise.
Most of the cities looked back in suspicion, and all combined less
than matched the king's personal pledge. The final capital came to
only 56% of the goal and only half what had launched the Dutch.
War
broke out with Holland. French efforts by Admiral La Haye to capture
Ceylon were unsuccessful. The East India Company cost Jabach a heavy
bundle. Though the enterprise ultimately bore some shriveled fruit,
it did not give Jabach the return on capital when he needed it most.
This and presumably other ventures, brought him in 1670 to the brink
of ruin. He had a choice: bankruptcy or the total liquidation of his
art collection!
Logically
he should have siphoned off his masterpieces a few at a time to avoid
flooding the market and to conceal that he was involved in a forced
sale. But his creditors were closing in too fast and without pity.
But who in the known world could absorb such a collection in a
swallow? Only one person — King Louis.
By
now LeBrun had become the head of Gobelins and the king’s chief
of artistic enterprise. Upon LeBrun’s advice, Louis had
acquired the best pictures belonging to the Duc de Richelieu and the
portfolios of engravings (for which Jabach owned the original
cartoons) amassed by Marolles. Previously the king had purchased
paintings from Jabach, most notably Titian’s Entombment of
Jesus.
Jabach
decided on a clean sweep. He offered the king everything: paintings,
drawings, bas-reliefs, busts, bronzes, furnitures, silver vessels,
and diamonds — and named a price, £581,025!
Colbert
shuddered.
But
Louis wanted the best art collection in the world, and Jabach’s
added to what he already owned would catapult him easily into first
place.
Hyacinthe Rigaud, King Louis XIV in full regalia.
What
would it cost? That almost unending mass of 120,000 prints acquired
from Marolles had cost the crown only £30,000. Ah, but these
were prints, not paintings or drawings.
Colbert
understood.
There
had to be a compromise, and he struck off the Jabach’s list the
diamonds, furniture, busts, and such. The king would buy only the
paintings and drawings: 101 paintings, virtually all masterpieces,
and an incredible 5542 drawings.
Jabach
recalculated his price for these: £450,000. Colbert instructed
him to provide an itemized list and to deposit all the canvases and
portfolios at the Hotel de Grammont. A shivering Jabach appeared
before Colbert in the cold first days of Februaary, 1671. He had
suffered two hemorrhages and could hardly stand. But it was his heart
that bled while he watched his treasures carried one by one on to the
icy street. A porter who lost his footing could split an old canvas
in a twinkle.
Colbert
summoned his own experts to make an evaluation. No records identify
them. They had to choose between their admiration for the art and the
strong will of Colbert, whose power over them was total.
“Jabach
demands an exhorbitant price,” the appraisers dutifully
informed Colbert. “The pieces are bad little biscuits.”
(Two and a half centuries later Jabach’s descendant, Sir Joseph
Duveen, would never cease to utter, “No price is ever too
high.”)
Undoubtedly
dictated by Colbert, the appraisers abruptly chunked another third
off the price for the paintings, giving a total for everything of
£280,839.
In
an observer’s words, “The poor Jabach was a martyr.”
Jabach
protested that his treasures “were too beautiful and too many;
if they were less fine and fewer, they would still be worth more than
that!” He got angrier. “I could easily put aside 800 of
the drawings, one sustaining another, and they would bring me more
than 100 écus each and are worth more than 300 the piece. Not
only that, they will not go as drawings but as the best and most
appetizing pictures in Europe when they are framed.”
Jabach
could turn nowhere. The identity of the experts who had sold him down
the river had been hidden from him. He could bring no pressures, no
appeals. Even Colbert, deep in the perpetual role of pre-Pavlov
psychologist and grand inquisitor, disappeared.
Jabach
was left access only to Du Metz, the Controller General for the Crown
Furniture. To plead to him was infuriating and debilitating. Du Metz
had no power. It was as if Colbert, erstwhile friend, no longer
wanted to buy.
Jabach’s
creditors did not go into hiding.
After
more than a month in torture Jabach wrote Colbert his final cry of
agony. “Consider, in the name of God, that I find myself thrust
between the hammer and the anvil, and that I have to deal with people
from whom there is no quarter. I beg of you, once again from the
bottom of my heart.”
From
this terrain Colbert could conclude the battle quickly. He took one
sniff of his bleeding adversary and sliced away £60,000 more
from his experts’ already scandalously low price.
For
King Louis XIV then, 101 paintings and 5542 drawings, 600 of these
from the School of Raphael alone. And for Jabach, a bond drawn on the
royal treasury for £220,000. “Colbert had dealt with
Jabach ‘not as a Christian but as a Moor.’”
Later
LeBrun was called to amalgam Jabach’s paintings with the royal
collection, and he sorted and hung them in the old Louvre near the
Galerie d’Apollon, where he thought they might be
admired by the privileged public of Paris. The idea of a public
collection was ephemeral, for Louis became so entranced with what he
found that he packed everything off to his burgeoning apartments in
Versailles. Eventually everything came back to the Louvre, and
Jabach’s loss became the world’s gain.
Records
were lost, and only 28 Louvre pieces can be traced definitively back
to Jabach, and every one of these is a piece beyond eulogy. There is
no reason to believe that the 73 others are in any way less
meritorious.
The
Royal Collection had contained no drawings. Through Jabach the Louvre
found itself with an inventory of unparalleled importance. There
were so many that only the best drew attention. For 200 years
drawings carrying Jabach’s stamp kept popping out of forgotten
drawers and corners of the museum.
Jabach’s
art dealings were far from over. He still had two decades of life,
home, contracts, mind, and tastes. After the brutal deal with
Colbert, affairs got better. As soon as the bill of sale was signed,
Colbert began to throw plums Jabach’s way. Revitalized, Jabach
began to collect again. And, no doubt, to sell.
Part
of the new collection was kept in Cologne, his hometown, where the
crown couldn’t touch it. By the time he died, March 6, 1695, he
owned 687 paintings, but except for another Giorgione, The
Adventure of Saint Helene, which cost him £5,000, a fine
Rubens, and a few other pieces by LeBrun, Snyders, Bourdon, Breughel,
and Holbein, they were mediocre by comparison to what he had
sacrificed.
After
his death his family found 4000 drawings carefully organized in 31
portfolios, and although most were not so rare as before, 1200 of
these were mounted in gilded mats. These trickled into public sales
in the 18th and 19th centuries. Some items went
to Austria via two nephews.
In
1721, a grandson, Gérard-Michel, discovered stacks of drawings
from this second collection and sold them off to a collector named
Zanetti, who happened to be going through Paris. I have no doubt that
this Zanetti was father or grandfather to the Vittorio Zanetti who
became the springboard for the fabled British art-merchant house
Thomas Agnew and Son.
Lawrence Jeppson is an art consultant, organizer and curator of art exhibitions, writer, editor
and publisher, lecturer, art historian, and appraiser. He is America's leading authority on
modern, handwoven French tapestries. He is expert on the works of William Henry Clapp, Nat
Leeb, Tsing-fang Chen, and several French artists.
He is founding president of the non-profit Mathieu Matégot Foundation for Contemporary
Tapestry, whose purview encompasses all 20th-century tapestry, an interest that traces back to
1948. For many years he represented the Association des Peintres-Cartonniers de Tapisserie and
Arelis in America.
Through the Smithsonian Institution Traveling Exhibition Service, the American Federation of
Arts, the Museum of Modern Art, and his own Art Circuit Services he has been a contributor to
or organizer of more than 200 art exhibitions in the United States, Canada, Japan, and Taiwan.
He owns AcroEditions, which publishes and/or distributes multiple-original art. He was co-founder and artistic director of Collectors' Investment Fund.
He is the director of the Spring Arts Foundation; Utah Cultural Arts Foundation, and the Fine
Arts Legacy Foundation
Lawrence is an early-in-the-month home teacher, whose beat is by elevator. In addition, he has spent the past six years hosting and promoting reunions of the missionaries who served in the French Mission (France, Belgium, and Switzerland) during the decade after WWII.