Years
ago, Fluffy and I were given a book called The
Paradox of Choice.
The premise of the book was that the more choices we get, the
greater our potential for being unhappy.
The
author divided people into two groups — Maximizers and
Satisficers. Maximizers are people who have to have everything just
right. Satisficers are people who are okay with having things that
are just good enough. According to the author, Maximizers are never
happy, because the moment they get the best car or the best computer,
a brand new one comes out that is just slightly better.
We
have many friends who are Maximizers, and we have seen how true this
is. The best sound system in the world is only good for a few
months. The best computer system in the world isn’t good for
that long. The largest TV screen is only good until a larger one
appears. And it drives Maximizers crazy to know there’s
something better than what they have, and
they don’t have it.
Fortunately
for us, Fluffy and I are Satisficers. It isn’t something we
chose. It isn’t something we attained by virtue, because we
certainly aren’t virtuous. I think it’s something that’s
genetic, like eye color. It’s just the way you’re wired.
We
have dear friends who are Maximizers, who do a whole lot of home
remodeling projects and who have helped us do a lot of home
remodeling in our own home. At one point they volunteered to do the
herculean task of painting our two-story living room and foyer. This
required replacing lighting fixtures, doing the ceiling and trim
painting, and basically spending a couple of weeks climbing up on
scaffolding.
I
spent days choosing a color for the room and finally chose a dark
parchment color called jute. I was happy. Life was good. We bought
a zillion gallons of the stuff. Our friends got on the scaffolding
and, like Michelangelo, we started painting.
They
painted with the speed of gazelles — if gazelles could hold
paintbrushes, that is.
Ten
minutes later, when they had painted a whole
lotof
wall, I looked at what they had
painted. “That’s a very dark jute,” I said. They
looked at the can. They said, “The can says the color is
pashmina. Let’s go back to the store and change it.”
They got off their backs and started to climb off the scaffolding.
But
I, like Fluffy, am a Satisficer. Satisficers realize that the same
room can look equally beautiful in a million different colors.
Perhaps I had not chosen pashmina, but it would work. In fact, the
dark taupe that was now on the wall was the color I had wanted to
paint the room until other friends had talked me out of it. This was
a happy accident I could live with. Best of all, it wasn’t my
fault.
“Keep
painting,” I said. Fluffy agreed. Our friends protested, but
I’m sure they were glad they didn’t have to go back to
the paint store and redo the work. I’m happy to say that our
artwork and furniture look just as good with pashmina as they would
have looked with jute. We bought more furniture to match the
pashmina. The room looks great. We are happy. Life is good.
That’s
the joy of being a Satisficer. When plans go awry, all you have to
do is throw away the plans and go in whatever direction life is
taking you. We Satisficers don’t have to have the Best
Dishwasher on the Market. As long as we have a good one that works,
we’re happy. And if the good one that works breaks, we’re
still happy — as long as we have a friend who will wash the
dishes with us.
Maximizers
don’t have the luxury we do. The more choices they see in
front of them, the scarier life gets. And that could be one reason
we’re seeing so many young people with what I call Peter Pan
Syndrome. They’re getting older, but they refuse to grow up.
When
I was a kid, girls had three choices when they left high school.
They could get a job, they could go to college, or they could get
married. (For Mormon girls who were still unmarried by the age of
21, they could serve as missionaries as a fourth option.)
Boys
could get a job, go to college, or join the military. If they were
Mormon boys, they went on a mission when they reached the age of 18.
That was about the extent of it.
And
those were enough choices for both young Satisficers and Maximizers
to handle.
Today,
the choices are endless. Not only can girls get jobs, go to college,
or get married, but now the Mormon girls can consider missionary
service as young as age 19, or they can choose to go when they are
older.
Boys
and girls are starting to think about “gap years” of
travel after high school, adopting a custom that has long been
followed by young Brits and other Europeans. They pick up their
backpacks and their maps; buy an open-ended ticket across the
Atlantic and wander — much to the consternation of the parents
they leave at home.
The
concept of travel is a heady one, but how do they do it? Do they do
it alone or with a friend? Which friend? What if they find a
girlfriend along the way and want to ditch the friend? And where do
they go? Which European countries? Or maybe they’ll go to
Asia instead. How much of a barrier would the language be? Which
languages could they get by without speaking?
Instead
of going to school, many of them are thinking about helping out in
third-world countries. But where do they help out? There are so
many third-world countries. What if
they choose the wrong one? Should they go to Thailand? Ghana?
Somewhere in Central America? What about Haiti? That’s a
place closer to home. Which place needs them the most?
And
once they choose a country, what should they be doing? Should they
be digging wells? Should they be rebuilding places that have been
destroyed by storm or by war? Should they be helping orphans?
Should they be helping plant gardens? There are just so
many needs.
Maybe
they’ll just go to school and study abroad. But even then,
which country will they choose? There are so
many choices. How do you choose the
right one? Will a semester in Jerusalem be too dangerous? Will a
semester in France be too frivolous? Will a semester in London be
too much like home? What if they choose Salzburg and their future
husband/wife is in Barcelona?
The
same is true of dating. The world is full of eligible candidates,
and college campuses are rampant with them. Jane is beautiful, but
Eliza has a great personality and Betsy would be a terrific mother to
your children. And if you pick any one of them, you could meet a
better one a year from now — or not. Should you choose one of
them, or should you wait? How do you choose?
Every
door a Maximizer opens means he is shutting other doors all around
the universe. The thought of it is paralyzing. There are too many
choices, and sometimes when there are too many choices, the easiest
thing to do is to make no choice at all.
If
your child finishes college and then knocks on your door, expecting
to reclaim his old bedroom and his old place in the family, he may be
a Maximizer living in a world of too many choices. But all is not
lost.
In
the recent April general conference, Elder
Ronald L. Hallstrom
gave hope to Maximizers everywhere when he said, “Once any of
us conclude, ‘That’s just the way I am,’ we give up
our ability to change.”
If
you’re harboring a Maximizer in your basement, or if you’re
raising a Maximizer who is yet to graduate from high school, there is
hope. Give him love and guidance. Narrow his choices in subtle
ways. Give him tough love when necessary.
Remember,
roughly half the population is made up of Maximizers. Maximizers can
be happy and successful people. In fact, you may be one yourself.
Life
has always been about choices, and our happiness depends in some
degree on the choices we make. Although our array of choices
sometimes seems unlimited, those who approach these decisions with
thoughtfulness will muddle through somehow and eventually find their
destiny.
Perhaps
those of us who have already been down some of these roads can serve
as guides for those still trying to navigate the big decisions of
life. Stranger things have happened.
Kathryn H. Kidd has been writing fiction, nonfiction, and "anything for money" longer than
most of her readers have even been alive. She has something to say on every topic, and the
possibility that her opinions may be dead wrong has never stopped her from expressing them at
every opportunity.
A native of New Orleans, Kathy grew up in Mandeville, Louisiana. She attended Brigham
Young University as a generic Protestant, having left the Episcopal Church when she was eight
because that church didn't believe what she did. She joined The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints as a BYU junior, finally overcoming her natural stubbornness because she
wanted a patriarchal blessing and couldn't get one unless she was a member of the Church. She
was baptized on a Saturday and received her patriarchal blessing two days later.
She married Clark L. Kidd, who appears in her columns as "Fluffy," more than thirty-five
years ago. They are the authors of numerous LDS-related books, the most popular of which is A
Convert's Guide to Mormon Life.
A former managing editor for Meridian Magazine, Kathy moderated a weekly column ("Circle of Sisters") for Meridian until she was derailed by illness in December of 2012. However, her biggest claim to fame is that she co-authored
Lovelock with Orson Scott Card. Lovelock has been translated into Spanish and Polish, which
would be a little more gratifying than it actually is if Kathy had been referred to by her real name
and not "Kathryn Kerr" on the cover of the Polish version.
Kathy has her own website, www.planetkathy.com, where she hopes to get back to writing a weekday blog once she recovers from being dysfunctional. Her entries recount her adventures and misadventures with Fluffy, who heroically
allows himself to be used as fodder for her columns at every possible opportunity.
Kathy spent seven years as a teacher of the Young Women in her ward, until she was recently released. She has not yet gotten used to interacting with the adults, and suspects it may take another seven years. A long-time home teacher with her husband, Clark, they have home taught the same family since 1988. The two of them have been temple workers since 1995, serving in the Washington D.C. Temple.