I
have a confession to make. I am a true crime junkie. For years I
was drawn to anything that dealt with the solutions to actual crimes.
Whether it was a book, a movie, or a newspaper account, I was
fascinated by the motives that drove people to commit hideous acts,
and the process used to track them down and bring them to justice.
I
didn’t just read the books. I was interested in the details in
the way that a forensic scientist would be interested. I was
fascinated by larvae or body temperatures or petechial hemorrhages.
Long before television audiences stared wide-eyed at the guys on
“CSI,” I anticipated the death scene in a book and
wondered whether the hyoid bone was broken and what the lividity
would tell me.
It
was a conscious decision that I made one day to kick my addiction. I
was getting hooked on true crime just the same way that other people
were getting hooked on video games or even on pornography. It was
hardening me in a way that I knew I wasn’t supposed to be hard.
This scared me.
On
another level, I knew that there were much better things to do with
my day than to spend my life watching the newly-launched Court-TV. I
have read too many books about near-death experiences, where the dead
are shown an overview of their entire life. I didn’t want to
be standing at the pearly gates and trying to justify spending a
large portion of my life immersed in blood and gore.
When
I quit, it was cold turkey. I stopped reading the books. I stopped
going to the movies. I stopped watching Court-TV. (I am glad the
O.J. Simpson trial was recently over by then, because I did a lot of
housework as I listened to that trial, even stripping the wax off the
floors in our kitchen. I would never have stripped those floors
without O.J. Simpson, and I want to thank the Juice for that.)
Ever
since I quit, I have stayed away from true crime completely. When
people ask me for my opinions on a big case, I stare at them blankly.
I know the names, but I don’t know the victim from the
perpetrator. I do this on purpose. I know I sound like an
ignoramus, but I have to stay away from it completely or I’ll
get hooked again.
There
is one exception. When we go on vacation, all bets are out the
window. Because we don’t have our trusty TiVo to manage our
television, we’re stuck with watching whatever happens to be on
at the moment. And even with several dozen cable stations, sometimes
the pickings are pretty slim. So we find ourselves watching stuff
that we never watch at home.
During
a recent vacation, we found that one of the cable stations was
running a marathon of shows about forensic detectives. Immortalized
by such fictional shows as “CSI,” these are the
scientists who solve crimes using techniques such as fingerprints,
fibers, and DNA evidence. But the series we watched was not
fictional, and all of the stories shown were based on actual cases.
One
case we watched was particularly memorable. A man was found dead,
and his wife was the suspect. He had been threatening to divorce
her, and she didn’t want to lose her part of the estate. When
they found what was left of the husband, his body had been wrapped in
plastic and partially dissolved using an acid that can be found at
hardware stores.
One
of the detectives suggested they go to all the local hardware stores
where this unusual acid had been recently purchased, and see if they
could discover anything by looking at the footage from the security
cameras. Sure enough, at one of the stores they found images of a
woman buying a plastic tarp and two packages of the acid that had
been used.
There
was only one problem. They couldn’t positively identify the
woman in the video as the suspect. She had paid in cash, and had
disguised herself with long clothes, a floppy hat, and a pair of
sunglasses.
But
then the detectives spotted something that broke the case wide open.
The woman in the video had used a preferred-customer card to get a
discount on her purchase. The detectives were then able to get the
card number from the receipt and track it back to the victim’s
wife.
Armed
with the video and other evidence, they were able to convict the
woman of murdering her husband, and she received a sentence of 20
years in prison.
Here’s
the punch line to the story. By using her preferred-customer card,
the woman had saved a whopping $0.34 on her purchase. She would
never have been arrested if she hadn’t used her card to save
those thirty-four cents. In retrospect, she probably was not very
happy about the bargain she made.
This
got me to thinking about the decisions we make, and how they can
alter our future. I doubt many of us could top the woman in this
story in terms of bad decisions. But I’m sure all of us can
look back at past decisions and say “If only I hadn’t
done that.”
Fluffy
and I like to play computer games. We used to love playing Duke
Nukem, a one-person shooter game where you could have lots of fun
blasting aliens. Like many computer games, Duke has a “save”
feature, where you can save the status of your game and then reload
it later.
This
was always helpful if you were exploring a new sector of the game and
were worried about being attacked. If things didn’t go well,
and the aliens really blasted you, you could always reload the game
from the last saved point and try again and again until you were
satisfied with your results.
Wouldn’t
it be nice if life had a “save” feature? We could do a
“save” before making any big decision, and then go back
to that point if we decided later that we had made a wrong choice.
None
of us have a crystal ball, and none of us can predict the outcome of
the hundreds of decisions we make on a daily basis. When we make the
wrong decisions, we just have to clean up the mess as well as we can
and keep on trying. Hopefully, even our worst decisions will not
result in something as serious as a twenty-year prison stay.
Just
as we are all human, we will all make our share of mistakes and have
to deal with them. If we are living as we should, we will learn from
our mistakes and not repeat them in the future.
For
most religious people, the gift of repentance is the closest we can
come to having a “do over.” It is a great feeling to
know that God will remember our sins no more. Sometimes the hardest
part is forgiving ourselves and allowing ourselves to move on. Some
sins can weigh heavily on our minds long after everyone else has
forgotten about the incident.
Another
big feature of repentance is the act of restitution. Although it
isn’t possible to restore everything to rights, part of the
repentance process requires us to do what we can to make the injured
party whole again.
That
is why parents march their shoplifting children back down to the
store to return what they stole, and why young baseball players often
have memories of working to make money to replace broken windows.
When people learn at a young age how painful the act of restitution
is, they are far less likely to want to do things as an adult that
will require them to make restitution in the future.
Receiving
the gift of repentance means we must acknowledge that everyone else
is worthy of the same gift — even individuals or groups we
don’t like. As the scriptures remind us, we can only receive
this great blessing as long as we extend forgiveness to everyone
else. That’s easier said than done, but once we are able to do
it we are well on the road to spiritual maturity.
During
this time of year, I hope we are not so caught up in the celebrations
of the season that we overlook the true blessings in our lives, such
as repentance and forgiveness. They are gifts that will bring us
peace and happiness long after the other pretty gifts under the tree
are opened and forgotten.
Kathryn H. Kidd has been writing fiction, nonfiction, and "anything for money" longer than
most of her readers have even been alive. She has something to say on every topic, and the
possibility that her opinions may be dead wrong has never stopped her from expressing them at
every opportunity.
A native of New Orleans, Kathy grew up in Mandeville, Louisiana. She attended Brigham
Young University as a generic Protestant, having left the Episcopal Church when she was eight
because that church didn't believe what she did. She joined The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints as a BYU junior, finally overcoming her natural stubbornness because she
wanted a patriarchal blessing and couldn't get one unless she was a member of the Church. She
was baptized on a Saturday and received her patriarchal blessing two days later.
She married Clark L. Kidd, who appears in her columns as "Fluffy," more than thirty-five
years ago. They are the authors of numerous LDS-related books, the most popular of which is A
Convert's Guide to Mormon Life.
A former managing editor for Meridian Magazine, Kathy moderated a weekly column ("Circle of Sisters") for Meridian until she was derailed by illness in December of 2012. However, her biggest claim to fame is that she co-authored
Lovelock with Orson Scott Card. Lovelock has been translated into Spanish and Polish, which
would be a little more gratifying than it actually is if Kathy had been referred to by her real name
and not "Kathryn Kerr" on the cover of the Polish version.
Kathy has her own website, www.planetkathy.com, where she hopes to get back to writing a weekday blog once she recovers from being dysfunctional. Her entries recount her adventures and misadventures with Fluffy, who heroically
allows himself to be used as fodder for her columns at every possible opportunity.
Kathy spent seven years as a teacher of the Young Women in her ward, until she was recently released. She has not yet gotten used to interacting with the adults, and suspects it may take another seven years. A long-time home teacher with her husband, Clark, they have home taught the same family since 1988. The two of them have been temple workers since 1995, serving in the Washington D.C. Temple.