"We seldom get into trouble when we speak softly. It is only when we raise our voices that the sparks fly and tiny molehills become great mountains of contention."
So you open the local newspaper one morning and there's the banner headline:
City Has Been Split In Half
It seems the city has grown so much that in the judgement of the state
government and county authorities, it has become unmanageable. So they
secretly chose a dividing line and now you're a citizen of a newly formed city.
You still live in the same neighborhood; you haven't moved. But from now on,
your address will have a different city name. You have a new mayor and city
council.
Still, that's not such a huge difference, is it? It's not as if you can't still keep all
your old friends who have been assigned to the other city. You still shop in the
same places. You don't exactly live or die by the decisions of the local
government.
And yet, as time goes on, you find yourself feeling an allegiance to the new city,
while what used to be the other half starts feeling rather foreign to you. You
know people who live there, but you're not a citizen of that city any more.
Their decisions don't affect you -- it's your new city government that decides
about garbage pickup schedules, local speed limits, street repairs, parking
meters, and zoning laws.
This is my town, and that other is not, you think, and you're right.
Except, of course, that in a democracy, it's pretty rare for a city to get divided
or created without the people who live there getting a voice in the matter.
The Church is not a democracy. Everyone knows that wards get divided so
that they stay within a certain range of numbers of households, members, and
priesthood holders, and stakes divide so that there is a reasonable number of
units for stake leaders to visit and train, and of members to bring together for
conferences.
It's done secretly for the excellent reason that there is no boundary you can
draw that will thrill everybody. If you try to divide a unit openly, there'll be
people pushing for certain boundaries, and when their pleas are not heeded,
they can end up anywhere from disgruntled to inactive.
You just do it, announce it, and then let people adjust accordingly. If they
really hate the new boundaries they can move or, in rare cases and with good
reasons, get permission to attend a different ward.
Our stake conference was the week before Thanksgiving. Our stake presidency
had a superb record of never leaking anything. The only hint we had that
something was coming was that a new ward had been created in a nearby
town, taking a few families from our ward, and then the new ward and the
older units in that town were all added to our stake.
Suddenly we had fourteen units. That's getting toward critical mass. It
seemed obvious that the stake was going to be divided at the coming
conference.
The trouble was, there was no rational boundary we could imagine that didn't
split the city of Greensboro. Five units included some portion of the city, and
they were right in the center.
When the actual division was announced, all our speculation went out the
window, because three more wards were added in the process -- one from a
Charlotte stake, and two from the Winston-Salem Stake.
But we were right about one thing: Greensboro was split between the stakes.
My wife had lent a set of autumn-colored tablecloths to a sister in another
ward for use in a stake activity. She needed to get the tablecloths back
because somebody else needed to borrow them.
So she did what she always does -- she signed on to LDS.org and looked up
the phone number.
Only the Church's software was too efficient. It was only a couple of days after
the stake division went into effect, and already we had been cut off from access
to the contact information of anyone who had been assigned to the other stake.
It was as if the Church's computers expected that all ties between Church
members within our city had disappeared in the instant that the stake was
split.
It's like lending a book to a friend, and then he moves away without returning
it!
It would have been nice if newly divided stakes could have been given a grace
period -- say a year or even six months -- in which members of both stakes
could have some access to each other's contact information.
Fortunately, my wife still had that sister's email address, and just as
fortunately her email was answered within a few hours, so we got the
tablecloths back in time.
When you're part of the same stake, you can count on bumping into friends
and acquaintances from other wards. They'll be chaperoning at a stake dance,
attending stake priesthood or training meeting.
For the plays that we put on at our stake center -- one of the old kind, with a
stage built in -- we've been borrowing platforms from newer buildings in our
city in order to expand the stage space to accommodate large casts. Members
of the wards we borrowed from were likely to be in the plays; it was a shared
operation.
Now those wards have been picked up and moved into another stake. They
might as well be on the moon. It would be completely weird to borrow
platforms from them, since their members won't be taking part in any of our
plays in the future. And we'll miss them! (Not just the platforms -- the
performers, too.)
The core of Greensboro Stake had been together for nearly sixty years. There's
history here, ties of the heart and mind that can't be severed in a moment.
We just lost the Colfax Ward, whose meetinghouse sits on land so long held by
the Church that an LDS cemetery is built there. We also used to hold outdoor
stake dances at the pavilion on that land. Now it is part of the new High Point
Stake; we will be strangers if we visit there.
It used to be the most African-American members in our stake were part of the
old Greensboro Second Ward (now Greensboro Lakefield). During the years
before and after 1978, they relied on each other, sustained each other against
many kinds of adversity.
It was hard enough for many of those families to get used to the ward divisions
that split them between the Summit and Lakefield wards. Now the stake
division runs along that boundary. Following the normal patterns of Mormon
life, they'll never see each other!
It's as if friends had died, and you weren't even told about the funeral! Or as if
they moved away, so you'll never bump into them at the grocery store.
There are times, however, when establishing new boundaries may also serve to
help erase old boundaries; when unities of accomplishment are formed as
unities of protection are set aside.
We're the only church that does this terrible, wonderful thing to ourselves. It
keeps our bones from getting too old, our jointures too arthritic. Every
congregation is young; the Church is busy remaking itself all the time.
Orson Scott Card is the author of the novels Ender's Game, Ender's
Shadow, and Speaker for the Dead, which are widely read by adults and
younger readers, and are increasingly used in schools.
Besides these and other science fiction novels, Card writes contemporary
fantasy (Magic Street,Enchantment,Lost Boys), biblical novels (Stone Tables,Rachel and Leah), the American frontier fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker
(beginning with Seventh Son), poetry (An Open Book), and many plays and
scripts.
Card was born in Washington and grew up in California, Arizona, and
Utah. He served a mission for the LDS Church in Brazil in the early 1970s.
Besides his writing, he teaches occasional classes and workshops and directs
plays. He also teaches writing and literature at Southern Virginia University.
Card currently lives in Greensboro, North Carolina, with his wife,
Kristine Allen Card, and their youngest child, Zina Margaret.