In the U.S., at least, most of the elders who attend priesthood meeting are returned missionaries.
They learned a series of lessons and delivered them often. Lots of practice: Doesn't that mean
that they're already prepared to be excellent teachers?
Wouldn't that be nice.
As missionaries, they gave the same group of lessons for two years. They had a trained
companion to back them up or spell them off. They were teaching people who didn't know
much about the gospel.
Now, in elders quorum, many of the men they're teaching know at least as much as they do. The
lessons are different every time.
And there's another huge difference. As missionaries, their egos probably weren't on the line --
success was owed to the Spirit, and failure to the choices of the investigators.
But when you teach your fellow elders, it can feel as if your social standing in your ward is at
stake.
So all that I'm-not-prepared stuff ("I found out I was teaching just last night," "I read the lesson
during sacrament meeting") can be a way of excusing yourself in advance if people think you
didn't do a good job.
Or, worse, it can be a way of showing off. You hope to wow the other guys with your brilliant
insights into the gospel and/or your fantastic teaching, and yet you did it without preparation!
More likely, though, the last thing you want to do is appear to think you're better than the other
men in the group. If you showed clear signs of preparation and then delivered a fantastic lesson,
while speaking with the authority that comes from knowing what you're talking about, then the
other guys might think you were -- gasp! -- a gospel wonk (at best) or a complete showoff
smarty-pants (at worst).
Never mind that only the most ego-poor quorum members would ever think ill of you for doing a
good job. Elders who are products of the American education system have had it pounded into
them that the worst thing ever is to have other guys think that you think you're smart.
As far as I know, it's only in America where seeming smart is the kiss of death, socially. And
even in the absence of women -- or perhaps especially in the absence of women -- most men
cannot shake off the endless one-upmanship that typifies the behavior of young males.
But let's say you're in a quorum that has none of those ego problems. The teachers prepare; the
quorum members try to support them and participate.
And the meetings are still unbelievably dull.
The Lessons
Lessons consisting of sermons and writings of former Church Presidents are a good idea --
provided the teachers follow the example of Jacob and "liken the scriptures to ourselves." Too
often, though, teachers seem to think that because the words come from a prophet, it is enough
merely to read those words. It isn't.
Also, the manuals tend to cover the lasting verities of the gospel rather than the issues that face
us most urgently today. Only the most recent Presidents had an inkling of the world our elders
face. Joseph F. Smith, Brigham Young, even the Prophet Joseph didn't say much about
pornography, living together outside marriage, homosexuality, dealing with two careers, or even
child-rearing.
They lived in a culture where the first four were almost unheard of, and the last was almost
totally regarded as "women's work."
Yet today's elders are wrestling with temptations and struggling to do jobs that our earlier latter-day prophets had little to say about.
Still, the manuals provide only about half our lessons. In our stake, at least, a quarter of our
lessons are "teachings for our times," based on General Conference talks assigned by the stake
presidency. These are far more likely to be about contemporary issues.
But, again, when you have the words of a General Authority, which every man in the quorum is
capable of reading himself, what does an ordinary elder have to add to what an Apostle had to
say?
Know Your Quorum
What about the other quorum meetings? The ones decided on by the presidency of the quorum?
This is the opportunity for a presidency that really knows their fellow elders to assign topics that
have practical use -- even if they aren't specifically about the gospel. (In fact, everything is
included in the gospel, with the possible exception of tips for winning computer games.)
Alas, too many presidencies resort to lessons exhorting the elders to do their home teaching.
How many such "motivational" sessions can the average elder sit through in before his eyes
automatically glaze over and he begins to actively hate elders quorum?
As my mother used to say, "A rule not sufficiently learned is never too often repeated."
But in the case of elders quorum meetings, the best way to get elders excited about home
teaching is to get them excited about coming to church themselves. If lessons are so useful and
interesting that the elders are eager to come to priesthood meeting, they will start to think of
themselves as elders rather than simply as Mormons.
They are far more likely to place their priesthood duties as a high priority if they strongly
identify themselves with a quorum in which they can hardly wait for the next lesson.
Long ago, when the Church consisted mostly of farmers or tradesmen who could come in from
the fields or close down their shops for a few hours, priesthood meetings were held on weekdays,
during the morning or early evening.
They had gospel lessons, yes, but they also talked about matters of common concern. Irrigation
ditch maintenance and fair turns. The need to gather wood from the canyons. Competition with
gentile merchants. How to acquire goods that were to expensive to import from outside the
Rocky Mountains. New techniques of farming or accounting.
In those days, men didn't talk much about their feelings -- or about marriage or child-rearing
challenges. But they talked about their real-world concerns. They worked on problems and
solved them together.
What are the shared concerns of the elders in your quorum?
More to the point, since all of you are roughly at the same stage in your careers and your
families, who is going to show up with a great fountain of wisdom to help everybody else solve
the very same problems you're all struggling with?
Here is where a wise and prayerful presidency or teacher can consult with sources from the
outside world that offer solutions consistent with the gospel.
And there's another resource, right within your ward, which elders quorums could easily draw
upon -- but almost never do.
Next week, I'll finish up this series on elders quorum teaching by giving examples of excellent
resources -- the "best books" from which we can learn "words of wisdom," and human
resources as well.
But the most important point to keep in mind is this: You don't need to wait for some new
program from Salt Lake to lift your elders quorum instruction to its highest possible level. The
program is already there. It's just a matter of using it wisely, creatively, and with vigor.
Orson Scott Card is the author of the novels Ender's Game, Ender's
Shadow, and Speaker for the Dead, which are widely read by adults and
younger readers, and are increasingly used in schools.
Besides these and other science fiction novels, Card writes contemporary
fantasy (Magic Street,Enchantment,Lost Boys), biblical novels (Stone Tables,Rachel and Leah), the American frontier fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker
(beginning with Seventh Son), poetry (An Open Book), and many plays and
scripts.
Card was born in Washington and grew up in California, Arizona, and
Utah. He served a mission for the LDS Church in Brazil in the early 1970s.
Besides his writing, he teaches occasional classes and workshops and directs
plays. He also teaches writing and literature at Southern Virginia University.
Card currently lives in Greensboro, North Carolina, with his wife,
Kristine Allen Card, and their youngest child, Zina Margaret.